Study: Rising heat plus strenuous jobs could hurt worker health

The historic heat wave that hit the Pacific Northwest last month was not just uncomfortable and oppressive — it was deadly.

In Oregon, the triple-digit temperatures that scorched the region were responsible for 116 deaths, according to the Oregon Medical Examiner’s Office, and prompted Gov. Kate Brown to order Oregon Occupational Safety and Health to enact emergency rules to protect workers from extreme heat.  Climate change trends suggest such heat waves are becoming more common.

Now a new study led by a UO researcher is raising the alarm that physically demanding work in hot temperatures could increase rates of kidney disease in the United States among workers who toil outdoors.

Chris Chapman, a postdoctoral researcher who works in the Bowerman Sports Science Center, part of the Department of Human Physiology, is the lead author on the study. Other contributors include physiologists, critical care nephrologists, biostatisticians, epidemiologists and public health advocates, as well as Chapman’s mentor, Chris Minson, director of the Human Cardiovascular Control Lab and co-director of the Exercise and Environmental Physiology Labs at the UO. The study was published in the journal Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, part of the American Journal of Physiology.

Chapman and colleagues have been following an epidemic of heat-related kidney disease in Central America among workers who toil in the heat, as well as potentially related epidemics in Sri Lanka and India. They say there is growing concern that workers in the United States also are suffering from chronic kidney disease of nontraditional origin.

“With climate change and higher temperatures, we expect this is something the U.S. will be dealing with in the near future,” Chapman said.

The problem in the United States could be exacerbated because workers here tend to have higher rates of risk factors that contribute to kidney disease such as obesity, hypertension and diabetes.

“These other co-morbidities lead us to think this is something the U.S. should be paying attention to,” he said.

It’s possible heat-related kidney disease is less of an issue in the United States because of worker-protection regulations, or it could just be underreported, he said.

The researchers reviewed the available literature for environmental conditions and physiological strain, such as how much core body temperature increased during a work shift, among occupations that typically experience heat exposure, including farming, wildland firefighting, landscaping and utility work.

They found “surprisingly limited available evidence” that characterized those exposures among those workers in the United States, supporting the need for further investigation to understand their risk of heat-related kidney disease. The limited evidence they did find indicated that some workers in the United States may experience conditions that are similar to those in countries with workers that have high rates of chronic kidney disease of nontraditional origin.

“We don’t know the prevalence, and we don’t know the mechanisms that cause it to occur, so we can’t come up with preventative guidelines,” Chapman said.

Chronic kidney disease of nontraditional origin is as high as 42 percent among sugar cane workers in Nicaragua and also afflicts nonagricultural sectors in Central America, including construction, brick-making, mining and fishing, the study found. No consensus exists about whether these hot spots of kidney disease are caused primarily by occupational heat stress, but it is plausible that heat stress is a catalyst, Chapman said.

For example, frequent increases in core temperatures while performing physically demanding work can accelerate existing underlying illness, or it can increase the susceptibility of kidneys to damage during exposure to environmental or chemical toxins.

No study has investigated whether occupational heat exposure increases the risk of kidney disease among U.S. workers, representing “a significant gap in the literature,” the study says.

—By Tim Christie, University Communications